Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Brand New Jokes, Same Old Theories

The creation of the modern “easy” video distribution model has led to many “unrestricted” viral sketch comedy videos hitting the Internet. I would attempt to argue that modern viral videos apply elements of centuries-old theories to create comedic moments, elements which have been applied to a lesser-degree in mainstream media for decades. Naturally, many have argued that dissecting humor immediate removes the comedic value, thus rendering any advanced analysis fruitless. Towards these valid, but open-ended arguments, I wish to submit the following rebuttal: It’s flipping easy, and I’ve got the cashed checks to prove it. By using the applied studies of theorists such as Marx, Freud, and others, formulae for creating comedic moments can be made, and can be applied to create new humorous sketches.

The old joke of portraying figureheads behaving in farcical manners, can be viewed as more than just silly. When a public figure is portrayed as both nutty and abusive of power, they are illustrating the extreme ends to which the bourgeois can oppress the commoners. Marx passionately argued against this type of power abuse, and furthermore argued that it can be manifested in many types of governments. The above short illustrates the hidden power of the ruling class in democracy. Notice the strong Marxist symbolism when John Wilkes Booth finally “rises up” and defeats the ruling class with a hammer.

While the discredited volumes of Freud are veritably mountainous, there’s comedy gold in them thar’ hills. In fact, the Freudian defense mechanism of repression, particularly hetero- and homosexual repression, is almost always sound fodder for a comedic premise. The simple manifestation of unconscious desire, or a verbal spillage of the unconscious can almost always bring laughs if delivered correctly. In addition, the general acceptance of applied psychology, which Freud helped pioneer, has led to many skits and scenes with the main premise of psychological testing.

It’s not just these founding theorists who can be used to create humor. Most modern theories, if stark and depressing enough, can be twisted to create a comedic flow. The speculations on the extreme drive of business-driven greed, most notably by Todd Gitlin, has been parodied in modern media for decades. In fact, this notion is often spoofed by the media itself, such as in this classic sketch where the talk show host feels only for ratings. In fact, simply having outlandish characters ignore human perils and common convention in search of profit is frequently the fodder for popular viral sketch videos.

Though comedic presentation is an art form, by juxtaposing exaggerated theories of power and repression with modern inconveniences, a practically timeless formula for humor creation is revealed. Naturally, a bit of joke writing is needed, but these applications have been proven for decades of broadcast sketch comedy. With the introduction of the home video studio revolution, it is possible to distribute even more stark exaggerations and examinations of modern life, without the sharp restrictions of the broadcast regulatory agencies. This could lead to a revolution in more than just video distribution, perhaps the very limit in our ability to be self-expressive and comment socially is loosening.

2 comments:

Cissy said...

I agree with your viewpoint “It’s not just these founding theorists who can be used to create humor. Most modern theories, if stark and depressing enough, can be twisted to create a comedic flow.” Can you think of any example for this point? In media field, maybe? Any particular program?

The example I can think of for this is the TV show “The Office”. It is a kind of situation comedy, but it’s not the traditional kind. There is no laughter or making faces in the show, instead, the characters in the show all looked either depressed or stark. Some of them are weird and their behavior could make other characters seem even more depressed or stark. But that is where it is most funny for.

pomomo said...

Great observations, there does seem to be a correlation between humor and various theoretical perspectives. It makes sense when you consider that these theories attempt to explain human behavior and culture. I think that laughter is closely related to anxiety and that humor is a mechanism of communication that serves multiple societal and cultural purposes; different theories tease out different functions.
Take, for instance, a humorous commercial for Chili's (I think, or maybe Applebys) in which a waitress brings four men their food, announcing each entree as she sets it down. The first three have the he-man, brontosaurus burger type beef specials, while the fourth has the vegetable melange. This provokes the beef boys to sit up erect with chests puffed out and scowls on their faces as they sternly question, "The vegetable melange?" thus causing the veggie guy to shrink witheringly down in his seat.
Most in our culture would find this funny, but on another level, queer theory would assert, the three beefy boys' reactions are also a threat of violence that serves to reinforce male identity and differentiate it from the feminine, which is necessary and must be constantly reiterated in a patriarchal culture in order to maintain male dominance. Laughter in this perspective could be seen as evolved from what was originally an anxious reaction to a potential outbreak of violence that could threaten the integrity of the social group. How's that for dissecting the hell out of the humor of something?